|
Post by Enzo Palumbo on Sept 12, 2010 10:01:40 GMT -5
To Rachel:
RACHEL!!!! <33333 major props to being the BEST of the past winners! I think its well documented that i think your the greatest and very Michael Jordan esque.
My question to you is: What do you think are your best attributes that allowed you to be 2 for 2 in making derailed final 2's??
To James:
I think the social game is much more important than winning competitions. You were targetted constantly, i dont really get why you think its better to have to win everything to survive as opposed to someone who could just rely on AMAYEZING social skills and only win when they absolutely needed to. Explain why i should vote for the challenge whore strategy over the manipulator?
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Jamez Zinkand on Sept 12, 2010 23:41:59 GMT -5
Rachel is far from a "manipulator". She was nominated 5 times throughout the game, while I was only nominated 3 times. If she was more social than I was, which isn't possible seeing as how she wasn't on AIM, then how did she get nominated more than I did?
Also, I never anywhere said it is more important to be a physical threat than a social threat. It's best to be an equal of both.
All in all, however, I was both a better physical and social player than Rachel. She floated here, I actually made moves to get to where I'm at. She was the sack of potatoes that was here because I felt and feel that Parker would've been harder to beat in the F2.
|
|
|
Post by Rachel Reilly on Sept 13, 2010 19:30:54 GMT -5
|
|