|
Post by Brendon Villegas on Sept 12, 2010 22:20:16 GMT -5
Congrats to the both of you for making it to the end of the game. It's been a pretty lengthy process but you both made it, so a round of applause to the both of you.
James, you and I never saw eye to eye in this game or hardly ever talked for that matter, but congrats on making it to the end. You do deserve to be here for your HOH competition wins, so congratulations once again. Rachel, you played well from what I saw. I was an ally of yours early on at the start of the game, so I saw things some others did not. As much as you say you didn't care and you were just playing for fun, there were a few times were you seemed dedicated to the game and even to winning it.
James - Why does Rachel deserve to win this game? Why did you choose to take Rachel to the F2 over Parker, when you and Rachel hated eachother for the longest time? If you could pick a new F2 out of anyone from the Jury, who would those two be and who do you believe would win the game? Please explain your answer.
Rachel - You say that there are other people more deserving of sitting where you are now. If you could pick one person to take your spot from the Jury who would it be, and do you think they could beat James in the F2? If you could change one thing about your game, what would it be and how would you go about doing it? Please explain your answer.
Congrats to the both of you once again, and good luck.
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Jamez Zinkand on Sept 12, 2010 23:23:52 GMT -5
She doesn't. I took Rachel to the end over Parker simply because Parker had more of a chance at winning this game than Rachel does. Even though Rachel and I were huge enemies throughout the game I really don't mind her anymore. I still love to hate her, and I think she's kinda funny at times. But also still a huge bitch all the time Another reason I didn't take Parker to the end was because of our deal. The Deal: -- He votes out Rachel and not Kristen. If he doesn't then I will win the Final HOH and not take him to the end with me. A deal's a deal. I told him what would happen but he decided to break our deal anyway, and this is another reason I took Rachel to the end, and not Parker. A F2 I would love to see, as I just stated in Parker's questions, is Parker and Kristen. They had a huge rivalry all season and I would love to see them in a F2 together. It would be a very close vote, but since Kristen pissed off the Alliwhores, she would maybeeee lose 4-3 against Parker? Or something like that. It would be a photo finish for sure. And I would also love to see a F2 of Me/Allison. Two rams who headbutted one another all season. P.S. Hi Brendon Nice to meet ya
|
|
|
Post by Rachel Reilly on Sept 13, 2010 14:14:26 GMT -5
Brennnaaannn! I miss you! I’m so sorry that you got sent out of the game the way you did, but I’m also glad that you made the Jury too, obvi. But let’s get to these questions, shall we? I do think that there are much more deserving people that should be sitting where I am now. I mean, let’s be realistic. I was not a challenge whore, I wasn’t an endurance poster, and I didn’t have a pristine game. None of us did, yes, but there are people on the Jury who I feel that would have made a great F2. I was actually playing to take some of them to the end, and I told them as such. The first person that I feel deserved to be sitting in the end was Alison. Her game was amazing. She was one of the most entertaining, social, and competitive players in this game. Whether you want to deny it or not, Alison really did make an impact on this game and I for one saw this. After Alison got voted out, I knew that I didn’t want James to win the game. Not at all. I felt that his social gameplay was a bit explosive and repulsive at the same time. He was just mean and obnoxious, and I don’t really reward a game like that. So, after Alison left the game, I knew that I wanted either Parker or Kristen to take the victory. They were the second most deserving and they’ve played the series before, and they deserved a shot to atleast try and win the game if they made it to the F2.
Now, if I could pick one person to take my spot on the Jury .. it would have to be .. Alison. I know, shocker. But I mean, can anyone else here say that she honestly doesn’t deserve to be sitting up here? She was the perfect combination of everything that this series should have in a winner. I feel that if she had been up against James, it would have been one of the most entertaining F2’s ever. However, I think that if the votes panned out the way I foresee them, Alison would win a vote of 4-3. James’ gameplay was just more about winning competition and making enemies. The majority of his allies are on Pre-Jury for either being voted out or expelled. His social game wasn’t as great as he makes I tout to be, because let’s face it, I feel that I had more of a social connection with more of the later people in the game. I knew who to align with, stay loyal to, etc. I knew that if I made it far into the game with them and if somehow I made it to the end, I could have a real shot at winning this game even if it wasn’t the goal I had set out to accomplish. I want to make it known that just because I might have said I wasn’t playing to win, that doesn’t mean I’m just going to throw it all away even though I made it to the F2. How ridiculous would that be. It would pretty much be an insult to the game and those on the Jury who would have loved to have made it to where I am right now.
If there’s one thing I wish I could change about my game, it would have been my lack of competition victories. I feel that maybe I didn’t need the Head of Household’s so early on in the game, but Power of Veto competition wins have been more than fine. I feel that if I had done that my list of accomplishments and accolades would have been much more presentable here at the end where I am with James. I just feel like people are going to honor the competitive/obnoxious game as opposed to the low-key/”manipulative” game. I don’t know how much more I can prove to people that I was active in this game and was dedicated. I wrote lengthy confessionals, I was social, and I did care about my placement and my time period in this game. However, just because I said I was playing for fun or that I was a past winner .. that could completely ruin my chances of winning this game? I don’t think that’s necessarily fair. But nevertheless, I’m going to try and answer everyone questions to the best of my ability, and hopefully I answered yours to your liking. Thanks Brendon, and good luck with the voting. <3
|
|
|
Post by Brendon Villegas on Sept 13, 2010 16:25:58 GMT -5
Exactly the type of response I didn't want.
|
|
|
Post by Brendon Villegas on Sept 13, 2010 16:26:18 GMT -5
Thanks to the both of you for your answers.
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Jamez Zinkand on Sept 13, 2010 17:14:37 GMT -5
Exactly the type of response I didn't want. You weren't voting for me either way most likely dude, I'm just being honest and not sucking up to any Jurors.
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Jamez Zinkand on Sept 13, 2010 17:17:15 GMT -5
Also, Rachel, I don't know how you can call my social game "repulsive" and yet according to you Allison's social game was perfect... she tormented me, bullied me, and cursed me out all game. I was no where near as mean as she was, seriously.
|
|
|
Post by Rachel Reilly on Sept 13, 2010 17:31:38 GMT -5
Alison was mean in a classy, non-obnoxious, hysterical, amazing way. You on the other hand .. were vulgar, delusional, and often crossed a line. Example? When you described how you wanted to physically kill me. Scary, and a little monstrous. I'm speaking from experience here. I was never on the receiving end of Alison's remarks, but I was from yours.
|
|
|
Post by Enzo Palumbo on Sept 13, 2010 17:36:58 GMT -5
Lars. Your a solid Juror.
|
|
|
Post by Crazy Jamez Zinkand on Sept 13, 2010 17:39:19 GMT -5
Alison was mean in a classy, non-obnoxious, hysterical, amazing way. You on the other hand .. were vulgar, delusional, and often crossed a line. Example? When you described how you wanted to physically kill me. Scary, and a little monstrous. I'm speaking from experience here. I was never on the receiving end of Alison's remarks, but I was from yours. Rachel, all your Jury sucking up right now is hurting my head. You were just as classy as I was. And everything I said all game should've been taken in a sarcastic manner anyway... I'm quite the joker ;D
|
|